4 ms·
>the "true" origin or purpose of Bitcoin will never be known unless someone leaks it Well, that's really my question. Why don't people seem to care? >speculat
by unclebucknasty 13y ago
>the "true" origin or purpose of Bitcoin will never be known unless someone leaks it
Well, that's really my question. Why don't people seem to care?
>speculation is pointless IMO
And, that's the thinking that boggles my mind and prompted this post. Why is it that people don't think it matters? There are actually two things here: 1.) It appears to not at all be what attracted people to it, which also means that it is not conveying the presumed benefits to its adopters. and 2.) That implies that it's something else and is conveying some benefit to someone else.
So, with respect to those points, 1.) why do people continue to support it when their reasons have dissolved? and 2.) why don't they care that they have possibly been misled, wonder who misled them, and why?
I mean, it would be one thing if they just said "screw it" and walked away. But, they just seem to blindly continue supporting it.
>people are trying to apply their mainstream values to Bitcoin
Exactly. The mainstream swooped in quickly and swept all of those hopes away. But, it seems to not have deterred those early adopters that their dreams have been crushed. Perhaps with the gold rush, their support no longer matters as much. But, you'd think they'd almost revolt against their hopes being crushed. Yet, there's barely a grumble.
>It's easier for people to change their payment system than to change their values
Well said.
- wmf 13y agoTo elaborate on my point, speculation about Bitcoin's origin seems to produce many different hypotheses with no clear winner. It produces no actionable information and thus it's no more productive than watching House of Cards (but equally entertaining, at least to me). The whole point of Bitcoin is lack of trust, so we shouldn't believe anything Satoshi said even if we knew who he really was. Perhaps many Bitcoiners have already internalized this viewpoint; if they are comfortable using Bitcoin even with the assumption that it is a "black op"/"false flag"/"government trap" then the truth can hardly be worse. There is some precedent with Tor which is widely used by anti-government activists even though it is funded by the US military and developed by ex-NSA people. Getting back to the mainstream takeover, perhaps many Bitcoiners are letting their greed overcome their principles and they won't complain as long as they get rich. Some others may be irrational fanboys who can't let it go because that would require admitting that their identity was built on a sham.