38 ms·
See also: "A Rocket To Nowhere" by Maciej Cegłowski. http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm
by sbierwagen 13y ago
See also: "A Rocket To Nowhere" by Maciej Cegłowski. http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm
Future archaeologists trying to understand what the Shuttle
was for are going to have a mess on their hands. Why was
such a powerful rocket used only to reach very low orbits,
where air resistance and debris would limit the useful
lifetime of a satellite to a few years? Why was there both
a big cargo bay and a big crew compartment? What kind of
missions would require people to assist in deploying a
large payload? Why was the Shuttle intentionally crippled
so that it could not land on autopilot? ① Why go through
all the trouble to give the Shuttle large wings if it has
no jet engines and the glide characteristics of a brick?
Why build such complex, adjustable main engines and then
rely on the equivalent of two giant firecrackers to provide
most of the takeoff thrust? Why use a glass thermal
protection system, rather than a low-tech ablative shield?
And having chosen such a fragile method of heat protection,
why on earth mount the orbiter on the side of the rocket,
where things will fall on it during launch?
- avmich 13y agoAnd of course all these questions have answers, so our smart future archaeologists will eventually dig it up.
- josefresco 13y agoThe space shuttle was (too) many things to (too) many people. Mediocrity by committee.