> I've asked you to provide references. You haven't. Google. I even gave you the phrase to Google for: "unreasonable restraint of trade." In fact, add the te

> I've asked you to provide references. You haven't. Google. I even gave you the phrase to Google for: "unreasonable restraint of trade." In fact, add the term "every contract," and you'll find thousands of relevant hits, including Supreme Court cases going back a century. If you don't like Googling, then I recommend picking up a good textbook on antitrust law -- "unreasonable" will be in the index. It's just such a fundamental concept to antitrust law. Rivers of ink have been spilled debating what kind of behavior is reasonable and what is unreasonable. What you've just done is the antitrust equivalent of demanding a citation for the sky being blue. I give up. There's no way I can have a productive conversation about antitrust law with someone who aggressively demands citations for even the most basic of concepts. It shows that the primary motive is not to understand the topic at hand, but simply to argue. P.S. Since you like to accuse people of violating the rules of debate, this isn't an "appeal to authority." It's a suggestion that you get a better background in antitrust law before arguing with people about it.