3 ms·
This does qualify as (very poor) encoding, to me - the malicious code is stored in padded ASCII, which has to be decoded to unpadded before being interpreted.
by sesqu 13y ago
This does qualify as (very poor) encoding, to me - the malicious code is stored in padded ASCII, which has to be decoded to unpadded before being interpreted.
It doesn't use metadata, though, and I wouldn't call it steganography, since the image the data is in is never intended to be seen.
- nmc 13y agoBy such a definition, any form of expression is encoding, isn't it?
- sesqu 13y agoPretty much, except in coding theory you have to be explicit about your alphabet. Hall took this further, by positing that in television, viewers use individual and heterogeneous decoders. Anyway, the point is that the channel used to communicate the message in this case is unconventional, and that's why I consider encoding to occur. A casual observer would assume the datastream to encode an image, not a program, and as such the program can be said to be explicitly encoded, rather than implicitly.