3 ms·
Not sure which fallacy you refer to. I'm just trying to understand what is actually known about this issue and what is just anecdote like the OP. I know about
by spikels 13y ago
Not sure which fallacy you refer to. I'm just trying to understand what is actually known about this issue and what is just anecdote like the OP.
I know about the collapse of the cod catch in 1992[1] as well as declining catch of some species of tuna in some areas[2]. On the other hand some fisheries have come back after they supposedly collapsed, such as the BC sockeye salmon[3]. And since the overall catch is roughly flat any losses must have been made up by increases in other species. Right?
So I guess we are talking about a prediction for future global collapse. Is there good academic research on this? What is the specific forecast? What data do they use in their forecast?
The best academic article I could find is this[4] from UCSB and seems to say we generally don't have enough information to make forecasts.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_Atlantic_Northwest_Cod_Fishery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_Atlantic_North...
[2] http://web.archive.org/web/20100327022746/http://www.iss-foundation.org/files/e71afd66-086a-41c7-a71c-c2935687dcef/ISSF_A-2%20Summary%20%283%29.pdf http://web.archive.org/web/20100327022746/http://www.iss-fou...
[3] http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-sockeye-salmon-bounty-estimate-upped-to-30-million/article1378518/ http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-sock...
[4] http://www.pnas.org/content/110/40/15859 http://www.pnas.org/content/110/40/15859
- moultano 13y agoThe fallacy is that global fish production is related to the quantity of fish in the ocean. That number won't drop until after its too late.