>It is sheer folly to trust cryptographic software without source code. Do we need to fall prey to another RSA fiasco again? This software does not encrypt any

>It is sheer folly to trust cryptographic software without source code. Do we need to fall prey to another RSA fiasco again? This software does not encrypt anything and thus the user does not care about the correctness of the implementation. User machines would be testing hashes for bitcoin mining as compensation for access to web resources. What does the user care if the hashing fails as long as they get credited properly for the CPU time? >Indeed it does. My machine, my rules. "I choose not to run this software while it remains closed source." does not create a reason for the government to compel the creators to release the code. Otherwise, I don't see what your comment has to do with the story other than a generic comment saying "People shouldn't use closed source software."