Monopolies are not bad. YouTube totally dominating online video demonstrates that there aren't competitors that have any significant thing to compete on (yet).

Monopolies are not bad. YouTube totally dominating online video demonstrates that there aren't competitors that have any significant thing to compete on (yet). > They could create a new fantastic user community system YouTube hasn't implemented a social network because they're a monopoly? That's interesting logic. > There's no need for it, they already have "the best product". They have the YouTube product. As it is today, most people choose it over any alternative. Where's your free video sharing website and why is it better than youtube?