3 ms·
It's not explicitly said, but are they following Semantic Versioning? http://semver.org/ http://semver.org/
by 1qaz2wsx3edc 13y ago
It's not explicitly said, but are they following Semantic Versioning? http://semver.org/ http://semver.org/
- skywhopper 13y agoNot exactly. The article says the first number is for major lifecycle events, ie 1.0 means "production ready". They'll be releasing monthly and the second number will be the release increment. The third number will be for patches and fixes. So to me that doesn't fit in with the Semantic Versioning contract. I think the product is too young yet to use a version scheme that assumes relative API stability.
- stdbrouw 13y agoWell, to be fair, this is why even with semver 0.x means "anything goes". It's only from 1.x onwards that major version increments should be used for backwards-incompatible changes.
- 1qaz2wsx3edc 13y agoWell, I would assume 0.x.x is by nature unstable, so I'm not sure how it doesn't fit. I read the article, but I'm still left wondering for clarification.