3 ms·
The problem is that you still need VirtualBox AND Linux. I don't see how this is lighter weight...other than a 24MB image instead of a 160MB image.
by huslage 13y ago
The problem is that you still need VirtualBox AND Linux. I don't see how this is lighter weight...other than a 24MB image instead of a 160MB image.
- quarterto 13y agoI'm guessing you haven't heard of TinyCore Linux[0] before. It's tiny. It fits entirely in RAM and boots in 5 seconds on 10-year-old hardware. [0]: http://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/ http://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/
- jbverschoor 13y agoStill need virtualbox.
- zimbatm 13y agoI think the author meant light weight in terms of usage complexity, not system resources.