3 ms·
what I meant was that there's no reason for both to arise simply from the risk corridor provision. Obviously other stuff can make it rise.
by rtpg 13y ago
what I meant was that there's no reason for both to arise simply from the risk corridor provision. Obviously other stuff can make it rise.
- hga 13y agoAh, sorry, I didn't read what you were quoting carefully enough, although aren't there 3 or so "guarantees", 2 in addition to the risk corridors? Risk corridors by themselves, obviously not. Except if you ignore the fungibility of money aren't they ostensibly paid for by taxes on policies?? On the other hand "guarantees" will put less pressure on insurance companies to put pressure on suppliers of health care, resulting in less displacement to other customers.