4 ms·
Was he, per chance, invaded by a nation that loved its nationalism uber alles? A nation that was only recently unified from many tribes, and whose politicians l
by tobiasu 13y ago
Was he, per chance, invaded by a nation that loved its nationalism uber alles? A nation that was only recently unified from many tribes, and whose politicians longing for a great nation resulted in 50-70 million dead?
No thanks. Nationality is whose warlords turf you are born on. The second we get over this concept, the world will be a better place.
- dasil003 13y ago> The second we get over this concept, the world will be a better place. Thus paving the way for our multinational corporate overlords to consolidate control. Personally I am very scared for the type of global corruption that will be possible without national boundaries.
- cloverich 13y agoAs opposed to the national corruption that lends itself to global warfare, genocide, and nuclear warfare? I don't see it as good, nor do I see it as inherently worse.
- dasil003 13y agoAgreed, but my fear is that unification allows for consolidation of power in a way that current nation states prevent.
- jwr 13y agoWell, close, but Poland was invaded by a number of neighbors (we also did some invading ourselves, back when we actually could). Your reasoning makes me think of the prisoner's dilemma. Sure, if everyone agreed to just abandon the concepts of cultural identity (leading to nationality) and live in peace, the world would be a better place. But for the moment, I'm afraid that "world peace" is something that only Miss World candidates speak of regularly.
- tobiasu 13y agoBtw, I'm not suggesting to abandon cultural identity. Those are natural in a sense, while I feel that nationality is a tool to herd people in. Conflicts will continue to happen, no doubt, we're still human. But at least they are somewhat justified clashes, instead of made up wars that serve only the interests of an elite.