3 ms·
I would rather read a short article with pictures then read a 300+ page book. Both of them are subjective views anyway, it's not an exact science.
by CmonDev 13y ago
I would rather read a short article with pictures then read a 300+ page book. Both of them are subjective views anyway, it's not an exact science.
- Tloewald 13y agoSomething can be subjective and stupid.
- CmonDev 13y agoYes, but the contents of the article can be discussed here today. Because it's short.
- nazka 13y agoThere is the Philosophy in the Mathematics. It is a real branch like geometry or anything else. Socrate and others are simple to read.
- datphp 13y agoIt's actually as objective as you get, if there is such a thing as "rational". Rationality is the main principle of "exact" science too, and is a good tool to work within what we know. Unfortunately, it's also a limitation, and maybe what's preventing us from transcending our bonds[1]. [1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/
- cLeEOGPw 13y agoI view it as a sanity check that's preventing us from transcending from reality into imagination, which might or might not have anything to do with how world works.