4 ms·
Wait, it's "extremely unlikely" that the original contractor needed a "couple of months" and yet you state that the deadline was not insane because it was fixed
by ewoodrich 13y ago
Wait, it's "extremely unlikely" that the original contractor needed a "couple of months" and yet you state that the deadline was not insane because it was fixed in a "couple of months"?
Most of the actual repair to the site was done by the contractors in question, the "IT surge" team that was brought in were mostly for quarterbacking what needed to be done.
Would CGI Federal and the other contractors got it working with a bit more time? Maybe not, but I don't quite get how you can present such sweeping assumptions as fact.
- MichaelApproved 13y agoThe site was riddled with so many issues and "simple pickups", like 404 pages, that I had no confidence in that management team to finish the project within a couple of months. However, a new management team quickly showed that the problems were fixable by a competent team. I believe the timeline was reasonable for a well managed team.