3 ms·
They are bad things if they empower an ever more powerful monopoly.
by gress 13y ago
They are bad things if they empower an ever more powerful monopoly.
- bduerst 13y agoNitpick: Not all monopolies are bad (utilities, transportation, etc.) The term you're thinking of is conglomerate, because Google has at least one competitor in every one of it's markets, which isn't a monopoly.
- gress 13y agoNitpick: legally a monopoly doesn't require zero competitors.
- bduerst 13y ago> Legally Only when getting fined for antitrust or monopolistic behavior, which doesn't mean it is a monopoly - only that a regulating body is trying to prevent it from eventually becoming one. Definitively, mono-poly means one entity in the market.
- gress 13y agoI understand the etymology, however using that as a basis for reasoning is unhelpful since it's the legal and economic consequences in real-life that actually mean something.