3 ms·
They were only able to be a racketeer when they had near monopoly power. Now Google is in that role and we need someone to keep them in check.
by gress 13y ago
They were only able to be a racketeer when they had near monopoly power. Now Google is in that role and we need someone to keep them in check.
- shmerl 13y agoNo, it's like saying that since there are powers with nuclear weapons we need more of them to keep them in check.
- gress 13y agoIf you're going to use that analogy then I do think it's better to have more than one such power.
- shmerl 13y agoThe problem is, this analogy is not precise. In patent wars it often doesn't work because there are privateers (NPE patent trolls) which have nothing to lose and MS and other patent aggressors readily employ them to do the dirty work for them in order to avoid retaliation. So, the mere existence of many big patent holders does nothing to prevent such threats, and especially for smaller players.
- gress 13y agoTrue - it doesn't reduce the patent threat for smaller players. But it does limit the dominance of any one big player and provide more opportunities for smaller players to participate.