5 ms·
Incorrect, Xamarin is currently the best option for multi-platform development and it has a good Visual Studio integration.
by _random_ 13y ago
Incorrect, Xamarin is currently the best option for multi-platform development and it has a good Visual Studio integration.
- romanovcode 13y agoJust imagine how fast it would become popular if you could host MVC5/WebApi on Linux.
- _random_ 13y agoTrue :(
- voltagex_ 13y agohttp://www.mono-project.com/Compatibility http://www.mono-project.com/Compatibility MVC4 would be blocked by: > MVC4 - Partial, no async features supported. > ASP.NET 4.5 Async Pipeline - Needs an parallel processing pipeline with async support, not done.
- itsboring 13y agoI switched to ServiceStack from WebApi just so I didn't have to develop on windows.
- shmerl 13y agoNot really. C++ is way better in cross platform coverage.
- _random_ 13y agoYeah, but you want a higher-level language for most apps.
- shmerl 13y agoQuestionable, or I'd say depends on your taste. In mobile sphere C++ does just fine, especially when combined with Qt and QML. And performance still matters most of the time, whether we are talking about embedded or server systems.
- rational_indian 13y agoIf you are going to use Qt/QML you might as well move to C#. C# will always be more performant than JavaScript (QML is based on JS). Plus the bloat introduced by Qt (signals and slots etc) makes it just as slow as C# without any of its benefits.
- shmerl 13y agoWhat is that "always" based on? In Qt QML is needed for the interface only. All application logic can be written in C++ so performance is not an issue.