I'm not surprised to see this "threat" angle approached by NYT. Most of their articles on Bitcoin have been negative so far, and about how awful Bitcoin is whet

I'm not surprised to see this "threat" angle approached by NYT. Most of their articles on Bitcoin have been negative so far, and about how awful Bitcoin is whether from an economic point of view or from an "enabling crime" point of view. Normally, you would see "real journalists" try to balance the views, and insert opposite views and quotes in their articles. But not here, it seems.