Okay, let's calm down. While the result is great, this article does a pretty bad job describing it. "Could" is pretty darn important in the title. We're nowhere

Okay, let's calm down. While the result is great, this article does a pretty bad job describing it. "Could" is pretty darn important in the title. We're nowhere near applications here. For those not willing to read the papers, the original Quanta article[1] is better. I'm flagging this because it's so horribly editorialized. [1] https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140130-perfecting-the-art-of-sensible-nonsense/ https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140130-perfecting-...