I'd agree about it being a fluff piece, although I think the binary options you present aren't fair. I'm not a core developer on Julia, just a user and packag

I'd agree about it being a fluff piece, although I think the binary options you present aren't fair. I'm not a core developer on Julia, just a user and package creator. It is geared towards technical/scientific computing, and excels in that task - it has replaced the combination of Python and C++ I used previously. I think what Jeff Bezanson is saying is that there is nothing intrinsically unsuited about Julia for doing web programming or desktop applications. It benefits from a fresh start in this respect, and also by using best-of-breed libraries from OpenBLAS to libuv. This is in contrast to other languages for technical computing like MATLAB or R which I wouldn't consider to be practical choices for making, for example, a math-as-a-service application (although R is getting into this territory with things like shiny).