4 ms·
Using the transport layer is a bit of an odd choice for this comparison. The regular layer has the one-way arrows, as well as a wealth of other details: foot pa
by morsch 13y ago
Using the transport layer is a bit of an odd choice for this comparison. The regular layer has the one-way arrows, as well as a wealth of other details: foot paths, parking areas, bus stops. I suppose that does makes it look a bit cluttered, but still to me in this instance OSM is clearly superior.
- latch 13y agoAs you say, that extra detail makes it cluttered. I can only speak for myself, but having traveled to completely foreign locations, that extra clutter (that paradox of choice) just adds to the confusion and overwhelmingness of unknown territory. When I look at OSM for a city that I know well, i'm not nearly as overwhelmed and I do find the information quite handy. Two different use cases, I guess.