3 ms·
>It's easy to yell from the sidelines, but what is this hoping to accomplish? A total shutdown of the NSA? I doubt anyone thinks that, realistically. From what
by naterator 13y ago
>It's easy to yell from the sidelines, but what is this hoping to accomplish? A total shutdown of the NSA?
I doubt anyone thinks that, realistically. From what I gather this is essentially protesting, although a protest that actually causes those in power some discomfort. The NSA would have to start sourcing/generating it's own power and water. Anyone who works there will become persona-non-grata. In my opinion, this actually has the chance of doing something. Much better than 500,000 people marching down Broadway, then going home at the end of the day (Iraq war protest, anyone?).
And I don't think anyone wants to see the NSA go away completely either. I believe that if the Snowden documents revealed that everything the NSA was doing was outside the nations borders (or just not targeted at US citizens), no one would give two shits. They would even be pleasantly surprised, probably. But that's not what we found out. We found out that the NSA and it's secret court take the most liberal reading of the laws in place to do whatever they want, and with no good controls over who has access to what information, or when.
In short, this is a different form of protest, hopefully a more effective one.
- malandrew 13y agoThis. Furthermore, it shows employees of the NSA that many American citizens consider their current M.O. unconstitutional and therefore unpatriotic. At the end of the day the NSA is made up of Americans and it's important to remind those in this ivory tower that America values freedom and liberty over any security measures that will come at the cost of freedom and liberty. When a state bars the NSA from doing business within its borders, its sending a message to all NSA employees that the NSA currently does not represent the vision for America it believes in.