4 ms·
It agree that might turn out very well, but people have a right to be upset when the rules are changed mid-game.
by fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
It agree that might turn out very well, but people have a right to be upset when the rules are changed mid-game.
- maxerickson 13y agoIt's an important blockchain lesson, that there are no rules, only a combination of concentrated technical leadership and majority sentiment. If the blockchain this happened on was serious business you would probably see mass abandonment.
- fnordfnordfnord 13y ago>It's an important blockchain lesson, that there are no rules, only a combination of concentrated technical leadership and majority sentiment. Yeah. >If the blockchain this happened on was serious business you would probably see mass abandonment. The hard-currency fanatics would run. But where would they go?
- pmorici 13y agoThey would just fork the code base and take their existing doge stash down a different path.
- diego 13y agoThose were the original rules. The title is misleading, people are disappointed because they expected the devs to eliminate the perpetual generation of coins in the original software. The decision was simply to do nothing.
- oafitupa 13y agoThose weren't the original rules. Their development team made a mistake and the inflation problem was introduced. Bitcoiners warned them about this, they didn't listen.