3 ms·
We need to keep our paranoia in check. That article is B.S. — wrong on all the verifiable points. And the rest is just random guesses. I went and checked the G
by dogweather 13y ago
We need to keep our paranoia in check. That article is B.S. — wrong on all the verifiable points. And the rest is just random guesses.
I went and checked the German news (I'm American but lived in Germany 5 years, and am still fluent) and it turns out that ARD screwed the pooch on this one: the two most respected media outlets in Germany are pissed off and have written about ARD's shoddy editing and refusal to provide easy access to the full interview. Here are my translations for the titles:
Der Spiegel
"ARD relegates Snowden interview to the middle of the night"
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/ard-versendet-snowden-interview-vor-mitternacht-a-945657.html http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/ard-versendet-sno...
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung ("FAZ")
"The Snowden interview is going around the world ... or not?
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/edward-snowden-und-die-ard-ein-interview-geht-um-die-welt-oder-nicht-12771773.html http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/edward-snowden-...
Now, the Spiegel linked to ARD's mini-site for Snowden stuff, which claims to have the full video and full transcript in English: http://www.ndr.de/ratgeber/netzwelt/snowdeninterview101.html http://www.ndr.de/ratgeber/netzwelt/snowdeninterview101.html
And then this article all about how ARD at first would only put the interview out with the German dubbing. Then, under pressure, ARD released it with the original sound. But, wouldn't make it accessible overseas...
Der Spiegel
http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/tv/ndr-veroeffentlicht-snowden-interview-mit-originalton-a-945822.html http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/tv/ndr-veroeffentlicht-snowden-...
- spenvo 13y agoThe US media doesn't get a pass -- especially print media or long-form web articles on nytimes.com, etc, which shouldn't have concerned themselves with rights to video (see my response to 'nostromo'), but I was unaware of the copyright/licensing issues surrounding the interview until you brought them to light. I am more enraged by the explicit avoidance of the topic by the US media. Thanks for your comment
- rikacomet 13y agoYou must be talking about.. Kim.. err.. *Surgician
- 3rd3 13y ago"Einmal mit Profis arbeiten!"
- lispm 13y agoThe US media simply could have bought the rights. They usually pay millions for some pictures with an ape and some prominent person, or for photos of an enhanced ass married to some other guy.
- ceol 13y agoBecause people want to see them. People (as in the general public) really don't care about yet-another Snowden interview, so news outlets aren't going to shell out the big bucks.
- throwaway2048 13y agoyet another? I beleive this is the first one
- blakeja 13y agoThank you for taking the time to scope this out. Out of all the posts on this thread, very few people have taken the time to do the research, could be the language barrier of course.