3 ms·
I'm not very good at math, but I'm reading that as a 0.7% increase in your chance of getting cancer. From 'Physics for Future Presidents', they say it is commo
by pedalpete 13y ago
I'm not very good at math, but I'm reading that as a 0.7% increase in your chance of getting cancer.
From 'Physics for Future Presidents', they say it is commonly accepted that we have a 20% chance of DYING from cancer before calculating for outside influences. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=6DBnS2g-KrQC&pg=PA98&lpg=PA98&dq=physics+for+future+presidents+cancer&source=bl&ots=_0qSSAxozw&sig=mGZEYJPaciupf-a7ZUCS_HIEhac&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XZvtUqnqNsmZiQfq8IDQAQ&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=physics%20for%20future%20presidents%20cancer&f=false http://books.google.com.au/books?id=6DBnS2g-KrQC&pg=PA98&lpg...
Let's say the average person does not get a CT scan every year for 20 years, but rather gets 5 scans over their lifetime.
Those scans may detect an early stage of cancer, therefore saving the persons life.
They're risk of dying from cancer is approximately 20.2%. I suggest with the CT scan, their still coming out on top.
- novaleaf 13y agothat's an extra 0.7% for you. For a population of 300m (about the pop of the usa) that'd be an extra 2.1m people getting cancer.
- monkeyspaw 13y agoAny idea what the error bars are on that .7% figure?