4 ms·
I am not assuming that at all. You think RSA (the inventors) would have kept RSA (the algorithm) secret, had they not been able to patent it? I think you're m
by harshreality 13y ago
I am not assuming that at all.
You think RSA (the inventors) would have kept RSA (the algorithm) secret, had they not been able to patent it? I think you're mistaken.
The history of software/algorithm patents is a history of technologies with limited adoption and/or interop problems until the patents expired. Patents are more likely to kill the future of a technology than to promote the technology.
- everydayman 13y agonow we see your next assumption is that investment into R&D happens without incentives. It doesn't.
- throwawaykf03 13y agoBy assuming RSA would be invented without patents, you are begging the question. Would R, S and A even be employed by MIT and given free reign to do their research if MIT was not assured of capturing the rewards of their innovation? I think you'll find there are a negligible a number of institutions who will invest in anything without prospects of getting returns on it, much less risky enterprises like research.