3 ms·
>Don't want to answer a few questions about your trip? Fine, you're either a threat or you're just being a jerk. You don't get to fly. And if that was the exte
by BlackDeath3 13y ago
>Don't want to answer a few questions about your trip? Fine, you're either a threat or you're just being a jerk. You don't get to fly.
And if that was the extent of it, fair enough. Unfortunately, sometimes it's a little less "you don't get to fly" and a little more "I'm sorry sir, but we're going to have to detain you for several hours of invasive questioning".
>These would be educated, skilled individuals. Asking inappropriate questions would not be per procedure.
Maybe in CandyLand, this would be the case. Here on Earth, things do not always occur according to ideals.
- EpicEng 13y agoWell I'm not proposing that we detain people who won't answer a question. Again, I'm not proposing a carbon copy of the Israeli system. Maybe in CandyLand, this would be the case. Here on Earth, things do not always occur according to ideals. Well, yeah, of course, but there's nothing you can do to prevent that. You could make that argument of literally any system. Of course some people will do the wrong thing. The idea is that you correct it and do what you can to prevent it.
- pyre 13y ago> The idea is that you correct it and do what you can to prevent it. The US Government does not share this idea with you. It's much better to sweep it under the rug, because to admit to fault would hurt the public's confidence in The System(tm).