3 ms·
Yeah as bad as the first part of your post sounds it really isn't much different than my reality in a "traditional" ISP market here in the US. Technically I ha
by georgemcbay 13y ago
Yeah as bad as the first part of your post sounds it really isn't much different than my reality in a "traditional" ISP market here in the US.
Technically I have two choices, Time Warner Cable or AT&T DSL. Realistically I only have one choice because Time Warner Cable has proved that they are unable to keep an internet connection between my modem and their headend working for more than 6 hours at a stretch, so I'm stuck with 6mbps AT&T DSL, which is slow and overpriced relative to speed/caps but at least mostly reliable.
- hueving 13y ago>Yeah as bad as the first part of your post sounds it really isn't much different than my reality in a "traditional" ISP market here in the US. Did you miss the part where you can't avoid paying the fee? If you hate your provider that much, you can always cancel, which is not the case here.
- morgante 13y ago> Did you miss the part where you can't avoid paying the fee? If you hate your provider that much, you can always cancel, which is not the case here. Is not having internet service really a viable choice in modern America?
- hueving 13y agoThere are alternatives. If it's as poorly managed as the poster said, you could use DSL/Microwave/Cell instead.
- hayksaakian 13y agoIf you hate your power company you can just cancel (Your logic)
- hueving 13y agoThat's only my logic if there were companies that provided wireless power or power over the phone line that you could use instead.