3 ms·
>>>> Your long list qualifies as "asking for trouble" SPEECHLESS. So summary executions, starving your own people and using chemical weapons qualifies in your
by at-fates-hands 13y ago
>>>> Your long list qualifies as "asking for trouble"
SPEECHLESS.
So summary executions, starving your own people and using chemical weapons qualifies in your mind as "asking for trouble"? I'd love to see the rest of your Human Rights scale and what you think it takes to get to a level where you think interdiction is needed.
- shitgoose 13y agoMy scale is simple - do not intervene at all. US pretense that they intervened purely on humanitarian grounds is a pathetic lie obvious to the whole world. After they intervened they left a mess that is worse then before. Besides, after infamous appearance by Mr. Powell at the UN providing undeniable evidence of universal evildoing, I think US would be a bit more, ...how should I put it..., careful about spreading justice around the globe.