Those are separate matters: one is a matter of law, the other a matter of fact. Suppose for example, that the police interviewed this man and he confirmed ever

Those are separate matters: one is a matter of law, the other a matter of fact. Suppose for example, that the police interviewed this man and he confirmed every part of her story. Then I think there would be sufficient evidence of rape. On the other hand, if he gave a completely different story, maybe there would be insufficient evidence. The problem with the ADA is their apparently wrong understanding of the law