4 ms·
>by no means do we want to head towards a world in which claiming you said a word is sufficient to convict someone of a serious crime Are we not there already?
by BlackDeath3 13y ago
>by no means do we want to head towards a world in which claiming you said a word is sufficient to convict someone of a serious crime
Are we not there already? Who hasn't heard of false rape claims and such going way too far?
- frandroid 13y agoMRA, get the fuck out of here.
- BlackDeath3 13y agoThanks for the civil and rational response.
- MartinCron 13y agoI basically agree with where you're coming from, but I think that we can do better than that here. I think it would be prudent to delete that comment.
- dannypgh 13y agoYou're both wrong. Rape is not merely defined by someone saying "no." Sexual assault/penetration needs to occur as well. Maybe you shouldn't have sex with people if you have any doubt as to whether it's consensual? There are no more false claims of rape than any other crime. Please do some research before repeating such vile filth, especially in a male-dominated community such as this one. The fact that I am even having to post this is proof that your comment is rather derailing. http://theenlivenproject.com/the-truth-about-false-accusation/ http://theenlivenproject.com/the-truth-about-false-accusatio...
- BlackDeath3 13y agoA lot of great, civil, thoughtful responses here. Penetration occurs in consensual sex as well. All I'm saying is that I agree that we do not want to live in a world where a claim of rape (regardless of penetration occurring or not) is all that is required for a conviction.