I don't claim anything. The report claims "This appears to be a serious bug". If it wasn't, then they would have not suggested a patch and we would have not hav

I don't claim anything. The report claims "This appears to be a serious bug". If it wasn't, then they would have not suggested a patch and we would have not have this conversation. Now, I don't have to show you anything. What are you talking about? Do you dismiss me because I extrapolate developer attitudes from their obtuse/obscure code (dubious/discuss) or because I can't keep a stack of callbacks in my mind to get myself out of the maze (true by the way)? But what about that function? It has 5 arguments! Do you claim that they need no explanation whatsoever? And don't cheat. Tell me without looking what is "type" suppose to contain? [1]http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/compat.c#L223 http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/compat.c#L223