3 ms·
If you want to avoid polluting the HTML too much, you could always use the mixins/classes from the LESS or SASS files (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap-sass ht
by Bahamut 13y ago
If you want to avoid polluting the HTML too much, you could always use the mixins/classes from the LESS or SASS files (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap-sass https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap-sass for SASS).
Even as a frontend developer who knows CSS pretty well, I like using Bootstrap. It lets me focus on more important things.
For my workplace, the UI team will use a bit from Bootstrap, more if we're under time pressure to finish a project. They rather do stuff from scratch most of the time, but they're coming around on the ability to use mixins & slim down the CSS using the LESS.
- ahahah 13y agoA UI Semantics is probably essential before you start authoring HTML with application semantics, like HTTP Verbs via AJAX. So there's an essential need for things like LESS and SASS to provide managers for states, easy to follow metamixins for liberally namespacing HTML through classes at least. https://github.com/OscarGodson/HTML6 https://github.com/OscarGodson/HTML6 anyone?
- Flenser 13y agoI just wish there was a bootstrap-sass conversion that used silent classes everywhere so I could @extend my own classes to match bootstrap without having to bring in all of bootstrap. I've had to write a parser (based on https://npmjs.org/package/css https://npmjs.org/package/css ) to convert any css file to an scss file with all .classes converted to %partials so it produces no output until you @extend a class from one of the partials.