It's worth noting that the person you're replying to wasn't me. I don't mind being poked fun of. I often do it myself :) Framing this as a "responsibility" is

It's worth noting that the person you're replying to wasn't me. I don't mind being poked fun of. I often do it myself :) Framing this as a "responsibility" is the wrong way to look at it. If an advertisement makes a significant number of people feel negative emotions, it won't be effective, and what good is ineffective advertising? Who cares who's right, wrong, good, or bad? Much less who is responsible? I'm a flawed person. I openly accept that. I don't think my emotions in this situation are unique though, and I don't think they're basis to refer to someone as incorrectly functioning. It's what we do with those emotions that make us "correctly functioning" or not.