4 ms·
Actually, I moved away from Sass >because< of the Ruby tie in. Transpiling Sass to css using Ruby was using up most of my day. It's a dog! Fortunately, now the
by WalterSear 13y ago
Actually, I moved away from Sass >because< of the Ruby tie in. Transpiling Sass to css using Ruby was using up most of my day. It's a dog!
Fortunately, now there is node-sass and it's grunt wrapper, making for vastly faster transpiling process.
https://github.com/andrew/node-sass https://github.com/andrew/node-sass
- steveklabnik 13y agoThere's been work to re-write sass in C (or C++), preliminary reports showed it being 4,000x faster, IIRC.
- zachlatta 13y agohttps://github.com/hcatlin/libsass https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass
- lowboy 13y ago+1 for libsass. I started using Gulp instead of Grunt for a project, and gulp-sass uses libsass. My compilation times are now sometimes sub-millisecond (albeit with only 500 lines of scss spread across 4-5 files).
- radq 13y agoThis benchmark suggests it's more on the order of 10x? http://www.solitr.com/blog/2014/01/css-preprocessor-benchmark/ http://www.solitr.com/blog/2014/01/css-preprocessor-benchmar...
- steveklabnik 13y agoNeat! It was only partially ported when I last heard numbers, full support often slows things down quite a bit.
- glebm 13y agoAs of a few days ago it is complete enough to compile bootstrap-sass :) https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass/issues/231#issuecomment-33248428 https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass/issues/231#issuecomment-3...