3 ms·
This looks like a step in the right direction. In previous HN discussions, Facebook's approach to mobile app development hasn't gone over so well: Dalvik patch
by j_s 13y ago
This looks like a step in the right direction. In previous HN discussions, Facebook's approach to mobile app development hasn't gone over so well:
Dalvik patch for Facebook for Android | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5321634 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5321634
> I can't believe an app requires 8M RAM just for method names!
> They actually did have the stonkingly huge arrogance to monkey patch the OS
> Basically these engineers decided to be really clever, painted themselves
> into a corner, smashed a hole in the wall so as to escape from said corner,
> and then bragged about how great they are.
Updated Facebook for Android requires "Retrieve Running Apps" permission | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5543363 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5543363
> Is there any good reason they don't split the functionality to the
> appropriate applications? Then maybe they wouldn't have to hack dalvik to
> run a simple facebook client.