51 ms·
I may be reading this weird. object->getInstance makes no sense? You mean if object is a private member variable? So class _dir contains object as a member var
by jason_slack 13y ago
I may be reading this weird. object->getInstance makes no sense? You mean if object is a private member variable?
So class _dir contains object as a member variable.
_dir->Instance(), already has access to object without doing _dir_Instance()->object->Instance() as an example...?
- pmelendez 13y ago> object->getInstance makes no sense? If getInstance returns an instance of object class, and object is an instance itself, then it doesn't make sense or it is not a singleton. You can think it like this: if object class has one unique instance, then object == object->getInstance(), so in your case either object != object->getInstance and they are from the same class (hence it is not a singleton) or they are from different classes (once again then, it is not a singleton).