It's not an analogy, it shows the questionable wording of the GP's claim, which, with minimal adaption, can be made into quite a different argument with a rathe

It's not an analogy, it shows the questionable wording of the GP's claim, which, with minimal adaption, can be made into quite a different argument with a rather different feel to it. The whole point is that words and implications matter, in much the same way as the implication of "hacker culture == alcohol" matters. A potentially sensible point thus resembles a style of language that does all but helf reinforce the argument.