3 ms·

To speak of evolution when your time frame is 2008-2012 is somewhat far fetched. But I believe I see a reassuring trend here: http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?

• donquichotte 13y ago
  Clearly, golang is getting traction. http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=erlang%2Cclojure%2CAda%2Cscala%2Crust%2Cgo http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=erlang%2Cclojure%2CAda%2C...
  • ushi 13y ago
    Omg, look at C. It outperforms everything... http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=erlang%2Cclojure%2CAda%2Cscala%2Crust%2Cgo%2Cc http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=erlang%2Cclojure%2CAda%2C...
    • IgorPartola 13y ago
      As someone pointed out below, this just looks at substrings so looking for "C" means looking for any words that has the letter "C" in it.
• tunnuz 13y ago
  This comment made my day :D
• mappum 13y ago
  I would be terrified if "brainfuck" had a nonzero frequency.
  • deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]
  • vanderZwan 13y ago
    And yet, somehow very surprised.
  • zorlem 13y ago
    I wouldn't bet hard money that it doesn't exist, there is always Rule #34. http://xkcd.com/305/ http://xkcd.com/305/
• deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
• ot 13y ago
  Still, when performance matters, C is the blows all the others away by large: http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=erlang%2Cclojure%2CAda%2Cscala%2Crust%2Cgo%2CC http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=erlang%2Cclojure%2CAda%2C... Disclaimer: all puns intended
• RyanMcGreal 13y ago
  And Ruby is way ahead of Python: http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=python%2Cruby http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=python%2Cruby
• ttty 13y ago
  http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=teen%2Cblack%2Chot%2Ccock%2Cpussy%2Cbig%2Cass http://porngram.sexualitics.org/?q=teen%2Cblack%2Chot%2Ccock...