3 ms·
Yet another one of a long stream of articles from the NYTimes insulting Wikipedia. They should add a "Disclaimer: we consider free information online to be a co
by lacker 17y ago
Yet another one of a long stream of articles from the NYTimes insulting Wikipedia. They should add a "Disclaimer: we consider free information online to be a competitor, and hope it fails" to these sort of article.
- timwiseman 17y agoBut this one was insulting. It clearly portrayed the facts with limited judgment. At least as I read it, it made the "prominent personalities" that did not supply properly licensed photos as the source of the issue, if it is a real issue. At least as I understood it, it was quite neutral to wikipedia itself.
- timwiseman 17y agoSorry, I had a major typo. I meant to say: "But this one was NOT insulting."