Instead of asking a rhetorical question with an implied conclusion, it might be worth addressing the actual argument. You're implying that there is a certain t

Instead of asking a rhetorical question with an implied conclusion, it might be worth addressing the actual argument. You're implying that there is a certain threshold past which society will not tolerate its actions being potentially recorded. That may be the case, but I haven't heard it argued convincingly. If we are to take any lessons from history, it is that accepted social norms are subject to radical change. What was once utterly unthinkable has in many cases become hum-drum or even the social norm. Why should this (glass) be the hard line in the sand that human civilization draws?