the main problem with this analogy is that you have it structured so that Bjork is the "daughter", which is what your whole denouement relies on (where we're su

the main problem with this analogy is that you have it structured so that Bjork is the "daughter", which is what your whole denouement relies on (where we're supposed to be pissed at Icelandi for not covering for Bjork's mistakes). Bjork and Icelandi are, in a much more accurate version of this story, just friends, and Bjork lives in Icelandi's house. Icelandi is in no reasonable world culpable for Bjork's fuckups. oh, and as others have mentioned, you also glossed over the fact that Icelandi "repo's all of Bjork's stuff" and effectively "kicks her out of the house".