3 ms·
I think your second point applies equally to skilled developers. The MS stack is hard to set up and use. Actually, it probably applies more to experienced dev
by couchand 13y ago
I think your second point applies equally to skilled developers. The MS stack is hard to set up and use. Actually, it probably applies more to experienced developers who've seen the alternative.
- mehrdada 13y agoI'm not sure if "MS stack is hard to set up and use" is the right way to characterize it. SQL Server is probably the easiest full-fledged RDBMS to get up and running, for instance, and Visual Studio is among the most friction free environments I've seen (for getting started at least). However, I wholeheartedly agree that MS stack, mostly Windows, is hard to configure, monitor, and administer when you want to horizontally scale, primarily because of the GUI driven configuration mindset and proprietary nature.