In the linked article, whenever they mention a person with a particularly poor Wikipedia photo, they have a hyperlink. When I saw this, I thought, "how progres

In the linked article, whenever they mention a person with a particularly poor Wikipedia photo, they have a hyperlink. When I saw this, I thought, "how progressive for them to link to all the photos so I can see what they're talking about!" Of course, they don't actually link to the Wikipedia photos, or even the Wikipedia page. They link to the near-useless, generic NY Times "more content about this" page for that name. I guess it was never a mystery why people started leaving newspapers for blogs, was it?