2 ms·
Practically, that's not really all that different from what the United States did, but instead of a drawn out process they did it in quickfire sales. The govern
by rhino369 13y ago
Practically, that's not really all that different from what the United States did, but instead of a drawn out process they did it in quickfire sales. The government forced the bankrupt banks to sell themselves to the non-bankrupt banks for virtually nothing. And it loaned and took stock (which is partial nationalization) in the non-bankrupt banks so those banks could pay the debts of the newly acquired failed banks.
The government basically forcibly reorganized the banking system in a matter of weeks.
The only difference is stockholders from the failed banks only lost 98-99% of their investment instead of 100%. A small price to pay for a quick solution to the largest financial crisis in 80 years.