This is really unsettling. When first reading through it I thought it was going to be some kind of digital journal or time capsule thing, maybe one that has st

This is really unsettling. When first reading through it I thought it was going to be some kind of digital journal or time capsule thing, maybe one that has strong guarantees against data loss. But then I got to the part about interacting with the virtual you. They're trying to emulate a person, a (formerly) living, breathing person, by looking at them from the outside. And then they want to speak for that person. Am I the only one who's bothered by this? Who finds this disrespectful? They're trying to emulate you based on the things you share with them, presumably. But that is a very far cry from preserving the person as a whole, and presenting it that way is disingenuous. Because you won't be interacting with that person. That person is gone. You'll be interacting with a crude facsimile of that person's branding. If I were to have immortality, I'd much rather have it by not dying.