3 ms·
That would still require a large amount of trust in those companies and that they are not breached or subpoenaed, though. It would not be far-fetched at the mo
by Zikes 13y ago
That would still require a large amount of trust in those companies and that they are not breached or subpoenaed, though.
It would not be far-fetched at the moment to imagine that Google has been explicitly barred from implementing a feature in GMail that would prevent them from being able to provide the contents of a person's mailbox to the NSA or FBI if requested.
- Zigurd 13y ago> It would not be far-fetched at the moment to imagine that Google has been explicitly barred from implementing a feature in GMail that would prevent them from being able to provide the contents of a person's mailbox to the NSA or FBI if requested. Indeed you have to wonder why not one major email provider has offered a paid option for secure mail. As others have pointed out, that still leaves meta-data in the open. But secure-payload plus pseudonymous, deniable identities makes targeting difficult and unreliable. That would be a big improvement.