3 ms·
I find it amusing that the underlying technology that made this study possible was patented (end of page 1), but that a royalty free alternative solution was fo
by jostmey 13y ago
I find it amusing that the underlying technology that made this study possible was patented (end of page 1), but that a royalty free alternative solution was found. In science people are often quick to patent each new breakthrough, which sometimes just prevents other scientist from building on that initial breakthrough. I think it is an important lesson to realize that not every new discovery is worth patenting. Perhaps only when a technology is truly ready to be brought to market in the foreseeable future should a patent be considered. Otherwise, the patent could become a distraction to the importance of the breakthrough itself.
- skosuri 13y agoAll the technologies described in this article have many competing patent claims by academics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley, and a few others. Obviously it's hard to tell right now which patents will go through, but I'm pretty sure they won't be royalty free. The main difference is that the procedure is now so easy that most academics will just infringe.