4 ms·

I think it's pretty obvious at this point that Satoshi Nakamoto is just Gavin Andresen's pseudonym. Is there anything wrong with that assumption? http://en.wik

I think it's pretty obvious at this point that Satoshi Nakamoto is just Gavin Andresen's pseudonym. Is there anything wrong with that assumption? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Andresen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Andresen https://github.com/gavinandresen https://github.com/gavinandresen https://twitter.com/gavinandresen https://twitter.com/gavinandresen https://plus.google.com/117494054859918211010 https://plus.google.com/117494054859918211010

mcintyre1994 13y ago
I haven't really researched either character, but Gavin seems to claim/imply he isn't Satoshi. ' This is quoted from the defunct Bruce Wagner Bitcoin podcast: "Bruce Wagner : When was the last time you chatted to satoshi <laugh> Gavin Andresen: Um... I haven't had email from satoshi in a couple months actually. The last email I sent him I actually told him I was going to talk at the CIA. So it's possible , that.... that may have um had something to with his deciding " ' https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113609.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113609.0 My reading of that thread is that it's common knowledge/expected that they're not the same person, but I certainly wouldn't claim to be sure.
- curiouslyNot 13y ago
  That does very little to exclude him from the list of candidates potentially responsible for the Satoshi Nakamoto alter-ego.