Their current line is that, with increased WebRTC adoption, bridges will somehow become unnecessary? I'm not convinced, and agree with you that there may be som

Their current line is that, with increased WebRTC adoption, bridges will somehow become unnecessary? I'm not convinced, and agree with you that there may be some problems here that will lead to poor performance (which is critical). According to someone (a developer?) further down this thread, they realize that incentives will be needed for things like this. It sounds sort of like the same problem that the bitcloud people are trying to solve, but to my knowledge nobody has any solid solutions. Why pay more for a blind CDN when 99.9% of your customers use infrastructure that only require you to use unsecured ones? That shouldn't be a rhetorical question--this is an important issue that needs to be addressed if we want to make the Internet a better, freer, and more secure place to communicate. We'll see if these guys come forward with something that sounds like it can work, I guess.