4 ms·
Set us straight then; expand your responses with your own knowledge of primary sources. Enlighten us.
by choult 13y ago
Set us straight then; expand your responses with your own knowledge of primary sources.
Enlighten us.
- vetinari 13y agoJanukovic asked EU first, they sent him home ("the problem with Ukrainian financing is your own, we don't care"). Then he asked Russia for a loan and they said yes.
- guard-of-terra 13y agoNow you have to admit that Janukovic asking EU first was not the most Russia-friendly thing you can imagine. And then some people should stop from blaming Russia for Janukovic being their toy. He is his own toy.
- vetinari 13y agoBlaming Russia is a convenient scapegoat: "See, those evil Russians?" Janukovic is Achmetov's toy.
- dmytrish 13y agoYanukovych had requested whopping $160 bln. And just guess where a large part of this sum would go. So his requirement looked like extortion, moreover, after a little shock I realized that this money meant "You give me 160 billions, I sell you Ukraine and you can do anything you want there".
- viach 13y ago-- Enlighten us. Just like cLeEOGPw did? Someone says "this is bad". Someone else says "this is good". As simple as that. No arguments in both cases.
- zxcdw 13y agoBut you decide to not provide additional information. You knowingly settle for not providing actual arguments to back up your claims. Do you think that these qualities are what Ukrainian people would want their society to be based upon?
- viach 13y ago-- But you decide to not provide additional information Yes, like the opponent did. He _decided_ to not provide additional information also, but put more words into it. Should i have said "Wrong, wrong, wrong"? I'm not claiming that my statement proves something. I just wanted to show the original post has zero prove also.